[Oer-community] What have maps ever done for us? and some comments

rwagasana gerard gerwaga at yahoo.com
Thu Nov 29 05:38:55 MST 2012


Thank you Andy, Susan (and of course other colleagues) for the excellent clarification.
rwagasana
 
Rwagasana Gerard 
P.O. Box 4301 Kigali - Rwanda
Mob: 250-788460976 
mailto: gerwaga at yahoo.com
  


The Secret: Thoughts become Things
 



>________________________________
> From: Susan D'Antoni <susandantoni at gmail.com>
>To: oer-community <oer-community at athabascau.ca> 
>Sent: Thursday, 29 November 2012, 4:19
>Subject: [Oer-community] What have maps ever done for us? and some comments
> 
>
>Dear Andy, Paul and Pat,
>
>
>First of all, today Andy articulated in his inimitable manner the value of maps, and Paul reminded us of the early comments made about wanting to find and link up with OER people - and the importance of connecting and networking.  It is good to hear that Pat and some others are working on this, but could you share what you are doing with the group?
>
>
>Best,
>
>
>Susan
>
>
>On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Pat Lockley <patrick.lockley at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>Hi Paul,
>>
>>
>>Myself and a few others are working on something like that, feel free to email me off list if interested.
>>
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>
>>Pat
>>
>>
>>
>>On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Paul Stacey <pstacey at creativecommons.org> wrote:
>>
>>Andy:
>>>
>>>Thanks for this comprehensive description of what an OER map could do. 
>>>
>>>I particularly want to support your call for an OER map of connections. 
>>>
>>>This correlates very well with a similar post I made earlier to this forum suggesting we generate an OER World Map 
that is more of a social network rather than a content network. I see a stronger value 
proposition for an OER World Map that focuses on 
connecting what currently are isolated OER initiatives into 
collaborative networks. You suggest that a map of connections could enable organizations to highlight what other organizations they have worked with and identify networks of activity around different aspects of OER work to make it easier for connections between initiatives to form. I think this is totally bang on. Most OER initiatives are fairly isolated from one another and I think an OER Map that helps generate connections between initiatives could be incredibly useful. I particularly am hopeful that we can move to an OER development approach that makes it a priority to, even before development of OER begins, find others beyond the local need who have an interest and need for the OER being developed. An OER World Map of connections could help us fulfill the promise of reuse by connecting development efforts with those with a need for the OER once development is complete.
>>>
>>>In my earlier suggestion I took this one step further. I believe an OER World Map focused on generating connections could connect OER users, not just developers, into networks of 
collaborative effort. I think OER development today is largely separated from, and not seeking feedback from, end users. An OER World Map of connections could provide a means for the intended beneficiaries of OER to express 
needs/requirements, and give feedback on their experiences of OER use. Why not provide a means for end users to have input into defining upfront requirements for OER? It could pool the requirements and needs OER are intended to fulfill and distribute the development/reuse effort more 
effectively across those engaged in OER development and use. 
>>>
>>>An OER World Map of connections could begin to form community around OER development similar to that which supports open source software development.
>>>
>>>-- 
>>>Paul Stacey
>>>Creative Commons
>>>(e) pstacey at creativecommons.org
>>>(w) http://creativecommons.org
>>>(me) http://creativecommons.org/staff#paulstacey
>>>(blog) http://edtechfrontier.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Andy.Lane <Andy.Lane at open.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>Hi
>>>> 
>>>>My apologies
for this long email but I want to try and set out all the assumptions for my
argument.
>>>> 
>>>>The challenge
we were set, as I see it, is to try to specify a mapping process that would be
of use to the growing OER movement or community. We have been presented with
one or two exemplars and some discussion of what it should feature but I want
to go back to some first principles about why mapping could be a useful
venture. 
>>>> 
>>>>Maps
are representations of the world as we find it, to help us make sense of that
world and to act within that world. They are partial snapshots of that world
and depend to a large degree on the representativeness and relevance of the
data and/or information used to construct them. That data can also be quantitative
(numbers in most cases) or qualitative (words in most cases) that are arranged
in some spatial form. They are also normally either representations of what the
world is like or what we think it ought to be like but should not mix the two
together.  The value of maps and many other types of diagrams is that they
show the relationships between things as well as the things themselves. And in
particular where there are lots of things and lots of relationships map are
able to show patterns that are not so evident from the ‘raw’ data. That
is why data visualisation is becoming an important area of study.
>>>> 
>>>>So
maps are there to help us ‘see’ things we may not otherwise have
seen and to make connections we might not otherwise have noticed. 
>>>> 
>>>>The
question for me then becomes one of: what things and what connections would I
like to see represented to help me better understand the world of the OER movement
and to help me act within it.
>>>> 
>>>>Well
the ‘things’ could be OER themselves (but there are lots of those
and they keep changing or getting added to all the time); people creating/using
OER (ditto); organisations creating/using OER (there are fewer of these and change
less often but their degree of involvement with OER could be highly variable); websites
‘hosting’ or ‘promoting’ OER (could be more of them than
organisations – The OU has a number of such websites – but they
also do ‘die’ more often); and OER initiatives/projects (some of
these are multi organisational but they do show significant OER activity but
are also very time limited because of funding). The type of data to be
collected on each of these is quite different. Overall I am tending towards
mapping organisations as the primary ‘thing’ but with the websites and/or
projects they are involved as ‘secondary’ things to capture as a kind
of ‘linked’ data so the map can show those different takes if need
be. Because of the temporal issue I note above I also think we need data on
when a ‘thing’ starts and when it finished (if appropriate) as this
will enable us to see the changes (hopefully growth) in all three both temporally
across the globe but also within regions and countries (and so we need data on a
location for the organisation or all parts of an organisation is it has multiple
sites).
>>>> 
>>>>Then
there are the connections. The above mapping of things will highlight some
existing connections (e.g. organisations working on the same project) but the
fact that organisations are included could enable those organisations to also
highlight what other organisations they have worked with or are working with
and why (e.g. research; translating OER). If users of the site can both add and
amend entries with new information as it arises and the purpose of the
connection is flagged by an agreed set of keywords then such a map would serve
the purpose of highlighting networks of activity around different aspects of
OER work (publishing; science teaching, assessment, translating, researching, outreach
etc) and so make it easier for folk in one organisation to find other organisations
with folk who may be interested in collaborating and sharing ideas and content
etc.
>>>> 
>>>>Overall
the map could act as a mediating agent for people to find people to share with
proactively (not to find OER per se as there are other means to do that as
others have commented on). Sounds a bit like linkedin for organisations but done
through a map ... hmm is that idea copyrighted?!
>>>> 
>>>>Andy
>>>> 
>>>>A.B.Lane,
Professor of Environmental Systems, Programme Director for EDIS and
Qualification Director for BSc Environmental Management and
Technology  
>>>>-- 
>>>>The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Oer-community mailing list
>>>>Oer-community at athabascau.ca
>>>>https://deimos.cs.athabascau.ca/mailman/listinfo/oer-community
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-- 
>>>Paul Stacey
>>>Creative Commons
>>>(e) pstacey at creativecommons.org
>>>(w) http://creativecommons.org
>>>(me) http://creativecommons.org/staff#paulstacey
>>>(blog) http://edtechfrontier.com
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Oer-community mailing list
>>>Oer-community at athabascau.ca
>>>https://deimos.cs.athabascau.ca/mailman/listinfo/oer-community
>>>
>>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Oer-community mailing list
>>Oer-community at athabascau.ca
>>https://deimos.cs.athabascau.ca/mailman/listinfo/oer-community
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Oer-community mailing list
>Oer-community at athabascau.ca
>https://deimos.cs.athabascau.ca/mailman/listinfo/oer-community
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://deimos.cs.athabascau.ca/mailman/private/oer-community/attachments/20121129/b86a6d42/attachment.html 


More information about the Oer-community mailing list