[Oer-community] Is MIT thinking of putting its OCW material behind a pay wall?
Tim Cook
timothywayne.cook at gmail.com
Mon Oct 11 13:32:36 MDT 2010
Hi Theo,
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 19:49 +0100, Theo Lynn wrote:
> Is this what this forum is about?
I joined thinking it is a group of individuals looking for ways to
create and distribute educational materials. As far as I can tell, that
is true.
>
> Someone subsidises all OER development. Acknowledging this is not inconsistent with education for all.
True.
> On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 11:36 -0400, Steve Foerster wrote:
> >> We disagree. Education is an important service, but it's not something
> >> that's magically immune to the laws of economics. It's not like
> >> physical infrastructure where the argument can be made that it's a
> >> natural monopoly. Since it's capable of supporting many different
> >> providers in the same space, education is actually better provided by a
> >> competitive marketplace than by a centralized bureaucracy.
I was specifically curious as to Steve's perspective related to this
paragraph he wrote.
Physical infrastructure is no more of a 'natural' monopoly than
education. In fact I would argue that education is more of a societal
good than physical infrastructure. But that is; so many apples and
oranges.
Cheers,
Tim
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://deimos.cs.athabascau.ca/mailman/private/oer-community/attachments/20101011/182b59d2/attachment.bin
More information about the Oer-community
mailing list